The "Opinions" are divided into 6 parts with a total of 22 articles. The content is relatively rich and the operability is also strong. Due to time constraints, I will focus on the following aspects:

First, it is strictly forbidden to seal up properties exceeding the target amount and to seal up properties randomly. In view of the problem of over-sealing and random sealing in some courts in practice, first of all, the "Opinions" clearly state that we must take effective measures to resolutely correct the phenomenon of over-sealing and random sealing in practice, unblock the channels for the people to reflect problems, implement "one case with two investigations" for relevant clues, and seriously deal with non-standard behaviors according to law. Secondly, it is stipulated that when freezing the deposit in the bank account of the person subject to execution, the specific amount should be clearly defined, and the flow of funds and the use of the account outside the frozen amount should not be affected; for real estate with a large volume, if its value obviously exceeds the amount of the creditor's rights, the corresponding value part should be sealed up; if the real estate has only one property right certificate and cannot be sealed up separately, the people's court should actively coordinate with relevant departments to handle the separate registration and separate sealing up when necessary. If the relevant departments refuse to assist without justified reasons, the people's court will take punitive measures against them according to law. Finally, in Article 7 of the "Opinions", we also stipulate that when freezing the stocks of listed companies, the number of stocks to be frozen shall be calculated based on the amount of the creditor's rights. When calculating, the value of each share shall be based on the closing price of the trading day before the freezing, and shall generally be determined within a range not exceeding 20%, and it is strictly forbidden to freeze the stocks of listed companies exceeding the target amount. In addition, for the stocks that have been pledged, and the applicant for enforcement in this case is not the pledgee, in view of the problems existing in practice such as the difficulty in determining the number of frozen stocks and the risk of freezing exceeding the target amount, we have also established a new type of freezing method for pledged stocks after communicating with relevant departments. The main purpose is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of creditors and prevent and solve the problem of freezing pledged stocks exceeding the target amount. All along, the Supreme People's Court's position on the issue of over-sealing and freezing is firm and its attitude is resolute. In the next stage, we will increase the supervision and rectification of this issue, and we also hope that leaders and comrades of courts at all levels will attach great importance to it and strictly implement it.

Second, ensure the maximization of the interests of both parties in the property realization process. First of all, on the basis of the existing judicial interpretations, the application of the sale procedure is further clarified or newly added. For example, on the basis of the provisions of the existing judicial interpretations, Item 2 of Article 9 of the "Opinions" adds a situation of direct sale, that is, if the proceeds from the direct sale are sufficient to pay off the enforcement debt and do not harm the interests of third parties, even if the enforcement creditor does not agree, the direct sale can be carried out without auction. For another example, Item 3 of Article 9 of the "Opinions" stipulates that if the person subject to execution believes that the court's assessed price is too low and the auction may damage his interests, and applies to sell the property himself at a price not lower than the assessed price, the people's court, after review, believes that there is no malicious collusion between the person subject to execution and others, deliberately suppressing the assessed price in the property assessment process, and selling the property at a low price at this price, it can also be allowed. Secondly, in the online auction process, maximize the attraction of more market players to participate in the bidding and avoid the failure of property auctions. For example, Article 10 of the "Opinions" stipulates that the people's court shall give full play to the professional advantages of the online auction platform and auction auxiliary institutions in the auction process, and do a good job in the video promotion of the auction items and on-site viewing. For another example, although according to the provisions of the existing judicial interpretations (Article 30 of the "Provisions on Auction and Sale"), after the auction property is sold, the people's court shall deliver it to the buyer within the prescribed time limit, unless it cannot be handed over according to law. However, in practice, some courts believe that the eviction is difficult when auctioning real estate, so they indicate in the publicity information that "they are not responsible for the eviction", which makes bidders dare not bid, which will not only lead to the failure of the property auction due to no one bidding, but also seriously damage the credibility of the judicial auction. Article 10 of the "Opinions" explicitly prohibits this.

Third, strictly apply the measures of the list of dishonest persons and restriction on consumption. First of all, Article 14 of the "Opinions" reiterates that the people's court must strictly take these two measures in accordance with the conditions and procedures stipulated in the relevant judicial interpretations, and Article 16 clarifies several situations in which punitive measures shall not be taken. Secondly, Article 15 of the "Opinions" stipulates that local courts may, in light of the actual circumstances of the case, grant a grace period of one to three months to the person subject to execution who decides to take punitive measures. If the person subject to execution voluntarily performs the obligations determined in the effective legal document within the grace period, no punitive measures will be taken; if the person subject to execution fails to perform the obligations, punitive measures will be taken again. Through this deterrent mechanism, on the one hand, it can urge the person subject to execution to perform his obligations, and on the other hand, it can minimize the adverse impact on the person subject to execution. Finally, Article 17 of the "Opinions" stipulates several situations in which the measures to restrict consumption are lifted or temporarily lifted. For example, after a company is restricted from consumption, if its legal representative or main person in charge does need to be changed due to the company's business management needs, and the original legal representative or main person in charge applies for lifting the restriction on consumption measures against himself, the people's court, after review, believes that the legal representative or main person in charge does not belong to the actual controller of the company or the person directly responsible for affecting the performance of the debt, that is to say, if there is no malicious change or evasion of enforcement, it shall be allowed. For another example, for the situations existing in practice where the individual who is restricted from consumption needs to rush to other places urgently because he himself or his close relatives suffer from serious diseases, or his close relatives die, etc., out of humanitarian considerations, the people's court shall temporarily lift the restrictions on taking airplanes and high-speed trains.

Issues that people's courts at all levels should pay attention to when implementing the "Opinions":

First, it is necessary to further enhance the initiative and sense of responsibility in benevolent and civilized enforcement, fully recognize the significant meaning of benevolent and civilized enforcement in improving the strict, standardized, fair, and civilized enforcement level of the people's courts, safeguarding social fairness and justice, promoting social harmony and stability, improving the property rights protection system, promoting the improvement of the business environment, and promoting high-quality development. In the enforcement process, this "Opinion" should be strictly implemented.

Second, it must be fully recognized that, at present, the main contradiction and prominent problem in enforcement work is still the evasion and avoidance of enforcement by the persons subjected to enforcement. Highlighting the mandatory nature of enforcement work, continuously increasing enforcement efforts, and severely cracking down on evasion, avoidance, and resistance to enforcement remain the main themes of enforcement work. Courts at all levels should follow the established work deployment, persevere, and work tirelessly to further consolidate and deepen the achievements of "basically solving the difficulty in enforcement," further improve the long-term mechanism for solving the difficulty in enforcement, and strive towards the goal of "effectively solving the difficulty in enforcement" proposed by the Party Central Committee.

Third, leading cadres and enforcement officers of courts at all levels must accurately grasp the essence of benevolent and civilized enforcement. Benevolent and civilized enforcement is a stricter, more standardized, and fairer requirement for enforcement work based on lawful enforcement. It should be recognized that strengthening the concept of benevolent and civilized enforcement is not to weaken enforcement efforts, nor is it to relax work standards or lower work requirements. It is necessary to resolutely eliminate passive enforcement, delayed enforcement, or selective enforcement under the pretext of "benevolent and civilized enforcement," and also to effectively prevent the persons subjected to enforcement from taking the opportunity to transfer property, evade enforcement, and damage the legitimate rights and interests of creditors.

II. Relevant Information on the "Opinions on Lawyers' Participation in Enforcement" 　　　　

In solving the difficulty in enforcement, under the strong leadership of the Party Central Committee, the people's courts have given full play to the institutional advantages of China's socialist system, which can concentrate efforts to accomplish great things, and strived to win the support and cooperation of all sectors of society, and actively built a comprehensive governance and source governance work pattern to solve the difficulty in enforcement. The No. 1 document issued by the Central Comprehensive Rule of Law Committee in 2019, "Opinions on Strengthening Comprehensive Governance to Effectively Solve the Difficulty in Enforcement from the Source," clearly proposes that "all regions and departments should actively introduce professional forces to participate in enforcement, establish and improve the working mechanism for arbitration, notarization, lawyers, accounting, auditing and other professional institutions and personnel to deeply participate in enforcement, and form a social synergy to solve the difficulty in enforcement." The "Outline of the People's Court Enforcement Work (2019-2023)" issued by the Supreme People's Court also regards "encouraging and supporting lawyers to participate in enforcement" as one of the important tasks of improving the open, dynamic, transparent, and convenient sunshine enforcement system, requiring "taking multiple measures to increase the proportion of lawyers participating in enforcement, building an information platform, providing convenience for lawyers to participate in enforcement, and giving full play to the role of lawyers in enforcement." In order to thoroughly implement the requirements of the Party Central Committee, on the basis of extensive solicitation of opinions and full demonstration, the Supreme People's Court, the Ministry of Justice, and the All China Lawyers Association jointly studied and formulated the "Opinions on Deeply Promoting Lawyers' Participation in the Enforcement Work of People's Courts."

The promulgation of the "Opinions" will help clarify the status and role of lawyers in promoting the enforcement work of the people's courts, provide a sufficient basis for promoting the comprehensive and in-depth participation of lawyers in enforcement work; help give full play to the professional advantages of lawyers, build a good interaction between lawyers and parties, and between lawyers and enforcement personnel, and establish and improve a long-term mechanism for solving the difficulty in enforcement; and help gather forces from all parties to enhance the legal awareness, integrity awareness, and risk awareness of the whole society, and promote the comprehensive rule of law and the construction of a social integrity system.

The "Opinions" consist of 3 parts and 16 articles. It mainly includes the following aspects:

First, deeply understand the significance and function of lawyers' participation in enforcement work. As socialist legal workers and an important part of the legal profession community, lawyers are important participants in the trial and enforcement activities of the people's courts, and play an important role in promoting the comprehensive rule of law and building a socialist rule of law country. In recent years, with the continuous increase in the number of enforcement cases and the continuous improvement of the level of enforcement specialization, many parties have great needs in terms of professional knowledge and finding people and property, and urgently need the deep participation of professional forces such as lawyers to give play to their positive role in the application of legal norms, the search for property clues, the assessment of enforcement risks, and the relief of legitimate rights and interests, and to meet the increasing judicial needs of the people by providing high-quality and efficient legal services.

Second, give full play to the important role of lawyers in enforcement work. The "Opinions" describe in detail how to give full play to the important role of lawyers in enforcement work in ten aspects. Each aspect is explained from the perspective of the role of lawyers and the guarantee of court functions. Due to time constraints, I will briefly introduce the relevant content: First, give full play to the role of lawyers in promoting the resolution of contradictions and disputes. The people's courts should establish and improve a diversified dispute resolution mechanism for enforcement cases, and explore and promote the establishment of "lawyer volunteer service posts" and "lawyer mediation studios." Second, give full play to the role of lawyers in property preservation, enforcement investigation, property control, and disposal. The people's courts should increase the application of preservation, and publicize the conditions, methods, and procedures for applying for preservation; broaden the methods and channels for enforcement investigation, and study and establish relevant working mechanisms such as entrusting lawyers to investigate; and protect the professional rights of lawyers in the property disposal process in accordance with the law to ensure the openness, fairness, and impartiality of the property disposal process. Third, give full play to the role of lawyers in preventing and combating evasion of enforcement. The people's courts should take measures such as restricting consumption and including them in the list of dishonest persons subjected to enforcement in accordance with the law, and increase the prevention and crackdown on evasion of enforcement. Fourth, give full play to the role of lawyers in participating in distribution and enforcement transfer to bankruptcy procedures. The people's courts should accept applications for participation in distribution in accordance with the law, and transfer enforcement cases to bankruptcy review in accordance with the law. Fifth, give full play to the role of lawyers in the procedure for terminating this enforcement and enforcement relief. The people's courts should apply the procedure for terminating this enforcement in accordance with the law, and deepen the system of lawyers' participation in resolving and acting as agents for appeals. Sixth, give full play to the role of lawyers in publicizing the rule of law in enforcement. The people's courts, judicial administrative organs, and lawyers associations should jointly guide the people to establish awareness of the rule of law and risk prevention awareness, and promote the solution of the difficulty in enforcement from the source.

Third, effectively strengthen the guarantee for lawyers' participation in enforcement work. The people's courts should protect the right of parties to entrust lawyers to act as agents in enforcement cases in accordance with the law; fully implement the requirements of judicial openness, unblock normal communication and channels for expressing opinions, create a clean, fair, just, open, and transparent judicial environment for lawyers to play their role, and actively build a new type of benign interaction relationship between enforcement personnel and lawyers that is mutually respectful, equal, supportive, supervisory, and properly communicative; build "micro-courts" and "smart courts," build a convenient and efficient litigation service system, and provide parties and agent lawyers with "one-stop" enforcement information disclosure services and more convenient channels for contacting judges; strengthen the supervision and management of lawyers' practice in enforcement work; and improve the communication and coordination mechanism among the people's courts, judicial administrative organs, and lawyers associations, study and solve the problems encountered by lawyers in participating in enforcement work, and timely coordinate and handle relevant matters such as infringement of lawyers' practice rights and lawyers' violations of laws and regulations.

Issues that should be paid attention to when implementing the "Opinions":

First, it is necessary to further improve the understanding of the importance of lawyers' participation in enforcement work, combine with their own work reality, actively explore and innovate various working mechanisms to protect lawyers' practice rights, improve lawyers' practice environment, and promote lawyers' participation in enforcement, and provide support and convenience for lawyers to perform their duties and give play to their advantages.

Second, it is necessary to actively explore various ways and channels for lawyers to participate in enforcement work, give full play to the functions and advantages of lawyers in resolving contradictions and disputes, investigating and controlling property, providing rights relief, and publicizing the rule of law, mobilize the enthusiasm of lawyers to participate in enforcement, support enforcement, and supervise enforcement, and form a social synergy to resolve the difficulty in enforcement.

Third, execution work should be carried out in strict accordance with laws, judicial interpretations, and normative documents. While further respecting and protecting the practice rights of lawyers, the "Ten Prohibitions" for regulating execution behaviors should be strictly implemented to prevent execution integrity risks. Fourth, communication and exchanges between the people's courts and judicial administrative organs and lawyers associations should be strengthened, and lawyers' opinions and suggestions on the execution work of the people's courts should be listened to regularly or irregularly, so as to continuously promote the formation of a working pattern of departmental linkage, joint management, division of labor and cooperation.

Fa Fa [2019] No. 34

Notice on Printing and Distributing the "Opinions on Deeply Promoting Lawyers' Participation in the Enforcement Work of People's Courts" by the Supreme People's Court, the Ministry of Justice, and the All China Lawyers Association

Opinions of the Supreme People's Court, the Ministry of Justice, and the All China Lawyers Association on Deeply Promoting Lawyers' Participation in the Enforcement Work of People's Courts 　　　　

In order to thoroughly implement the major decisions and deployments of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee on "effectively solving the problem of enforcement difficulties" and "legally ensuring that successful parties can realize their rights and interests in a timely manner," and in accordance with the Central Comprehensive Rule of Law Committee's "Opinions on Strengthening Comprehensive Governance to Effectively Solve the Problem of Enforcement Difficulties from the Source" (Zhong Fa Wei Fa [2019] No. 1) regarding "all regions and departments should actively introduce professional forces to participate in enforcement, establish and improve the working mechanism for arbitration, notarization, lawyers, accounting, auditing and other professional institutions and personnel to deeply participate in enforcement, and form a social synergy to solve the problem of enforcement difficulties," and in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, this opinion is formulated to further promote lawyers' participation in the enforcement work of the people's courts.

I. Deeply understand the importance of lawyers' participation in enforcement work 　

1. The enforcement work of the people's court is an important means to ensure the comprehensive and accurate implementation of the law by relying on national coercive force. It is a key link to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the people and realize social fairness and justice. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the Party Central Committee with Comrade Xi Jinping as the core has attached great importance to the enforcement work of the people's court, and has determined that solving the difficulty in enforcement is an important part of comprehensively governing the country according to law, and has made major decisions and deployments, requiring all regions and relevant departments to fully understand the important significance of enforcement work, strengthen the implementation of responsibilities, form a joint force, and actively build a comprehensive governance and source governance to solve the difficulty in enforcement.

Lawyers, as socialist rule of law workers and an important part of the legal profession community, are important participants in the trial and enforcement activities of the people's courts, and play an important role in promoting the comprehensive rule of law and building a socialist rule of law country. Deeply promoting lawyers' participation in enforcement work helps to implement the people-centered development thought, practice the purpose of serving the people through justice, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties in accordance with the law; it helps to establish and improve a long-term mechanism for solving the difficulty in enforcement, improve the ability of enforcement work, and maintain a high level of operation of enforcement work; it helps to gather strength from all parties, enhance the legal awareness, integrity awareness, and risk awareness of the whole society, and promote the comprehensive rule of law and the construction of a social integrity system.

2. Fully leverage the important role of lawyers in enforcement work 　　　　

2. Fully leverage the role of lawyers in promoting the enforcement work of the People's Courts. In recent years, with the continuous increase in the number of enforcement cases and the continuous improvement of the level of enforcement specialization, there is an urgent need for professional forces such as lawyers to deeply participate in enforcement, promote the timely and effective enforcement of effective legal documents by playing functional roles and undertaking some auxiliary work. In particular, many parties have great needs in terms of professional knowledge and finding people and property, and need lawyers to play an active role in the application of legal norms, the search for property clues, the assessment of enforcement risks, and the relief of legitimate rights and interests, and meet the growing judicial needs of the people by providing high-quality and efficient legal services.

People's Courts at all levels should further enhance their understanding of the importance of lawyers' participation in enforcement, and in light of their actual work, actively explore and innovate various working mechanisms to protect lawyers' practice rights, improve their practice environment, and promote their participation in enforcement, so as to provide support and convenience for lawyers to perform their duties and leverage their strengths in accordance with the law.

3. Fully leverage the role of lawyers in promoting the resolution of conflicts and disputes. Enforcement work is highly adversarial and risky, and can easily trigger conflicts and disputes. Fully leverage the bridging role of lawyers to promote communication and coordination between parties, and between parties and the People's Court. The lawyer should guide and assist the parties to correctly understand the judgment results of the effective legal documents, so that they are fully aware of the risks and consequences of refusing to perform legal obligations. If the parties do not approve of the judgment results, they should be guided to resolve them through appropriate procedures in accordance with the law. If there is a possibility of settlement, a settlement proposal may be put forward to assist the client in reaching an enforcement settlement with the other party. When assisting a party in drafting a settlement agreement, it shall adhere to the requirements of diligence and professionalism to ensure that all elements are complete, the writing is standardized, and it is practical and feasible. If a party fails to perform the settlement agreement, the lawyer may assist the client in applying to the People's Court for resumption of enforcement or filing a lawsuit with the People's Court for performance of the enforcement settlement agreement in accordance with the law.

People's Courts at all levels should establish and improve a diversified dispute resolution mechanism for enforcement cases, encourage resolving enforcement disputes through methods such as lawyer mediation, explore and promote the establishment of "Lawyer Volunteer Service Posts" and "Lawyer Mediation Studios," and effectively connect enforcement and mediation efforts. This aims to create conditions and convenience for lawyers to participate in conflict resolution as neutral third parties.

4. Fully leverage the role of lawyers in property preservation. Attorneys should fully explain litigation risks to their clients, clarify the importance of property preservation for realizing their rights, and guide them to promptly apply to the People's Court for property preservation. If preservation measures have already been taken, remind clients that they can apply to the People's Court for renewal of preservation seven days before the expiration of the preservation period; if the conditions for lifting the preservation are met, remind clients that they can apply for lifting the preservation in a timely manner.

People's courts at all levels should increase the application of litigation preservation, simplify the preservation work process, promote the preservation insurance guarantee mechanism, and provide convenience for parties to apply for preservation. The conditions, methods, and procedures for applying for preservation should be made public. Property preservation applications that meet the conditions should be accepted and preservation measures should be taken in a timely manner. The content of the preservation ruling, the expiration date of the preservation period, and related matters for applying for renewal of preservation should be informed to the applicant or the attorney, so as to fully protect the parties and their attorneys' right to know, right to object, and right to reconsideration.

5. Give full play to the role of lawyers in enforcement investigations. The executing applicant's attorney may assist the executing applicant in providing the people's court with information or clues about the property status of the person being executed, apply to the people's court for investigation, and, if necessary, apply to the people's court for the issuance of a reward announcement or entrust an auditing institution to conduct an audit. The attorney of the person being executed shall inform the person being executed of the obligation to truthfully report property to the people's court and explain the legal consequences of refusing to report, falsely reporting, or overdue reporting of property.

The people's court shall conduct enforcement investigations through the enforcement network control system and other necessary means. It is necessary to protect the right of lawyers to investigate and collect evidence in accordance with the law, further broaden the methods and channels of enforcement investigation, and study and establish a working mechanism for entrusting lawyers to investigate.

6. Give full play to the role of lawyers in property control and disposal. The people's court shall promptly seal up, detain, and freeze the property of the person being executed that should fulfill the obligation, and after completing the property control, it shall promptly notify the executing applicant or the attorney of the property control situation in writing. Before the expiration of the time limit for sealing up, detaining, and freezing, the attorney may assist the executing applicant in applying to the people's court for an extension of the time limit to prevent the consequences of property being transferred after the expiration of the time limit.

The people's court shall promptly dispose of the controlled property, and it is strictly forbidden to illegally evaluate and auction property and illegally offset debts with property. In the process of the people's court determining the reference price for property disposal, the attorney shall assist the parties in cooperating with the people's court to investigate the ownership, encumbrances, possession and use, unpaid taxes, quality defects, and other matters of the property to be disposed of in accordance with the law. The people's court shall protect the professional rights of the attorney in the process of property disposal in accordance with the law to ensure the openness, fairness, and impartiality of the property disposal process.

After the execution funds are received, the people's court shall notify the executing applicant or the specially authorized attorney to complete the collection procedures within the prescribed time limit, and it is strictly forbidden to conceal, intercept, embezzle execution funds and materials, and delay the issuance of execution funds.

7. Give full play to the role of lawyers in preventing and combating evasion of enforcement. The attorney of the person being executed shall explain to the party the consequences of not fulfilling legal obligations and guide and assist them in respecting effective legal documents and fulfilling obligations in accordance with the law. If the person being executed has illegal circumstances such as dishonesty, the executing applicant's attorney may assist the executing applicant in applying to the people's court to take measures such as restricting consumption and including them in the list of dishonest persons subject to enforcement in accordance with the law. If the person being executed has the ability to execute but refuses to execute the judgment or ruling, and the circumstances are serious and suspected of constituting a crime, the executing applicant's attorney may investigate and collect evidence in accordance with the law and assist the executing applicant in filing a complaint with the public security organ or filing a private prosecution with the people's court in accordance with the law.

The people's court shall increase the prevention and crackdown on evasion of enforcement, and include the person being executed who meets the statutory circumstances in the list of dishonest persons subject to enforcement in accordance with the law. For those who maliciously evade enforcement and transfer or conceal property, mandatory measures such as detention and fines shall be applied in a timely manner in accordance with the law; for those who are suspected of refusing to execute judgments or rulings, illegally disposing of sealed up, detained, or frozen property, and obstructing official duties, the case shall be transferred to the public security organ for investigation in accordance with the law. If the attorney guides and helps the executing applicant to file a criminal private prosecution, the enforcement department of the people's court shall support and cooperate, and the criminal trial department shall accept and adjudicate it in a timely manner.

8. Give full play to the role of lawyers in participating in distribution and enforcement transfer to bankruptcy procedures. If the person being executed is a citizen or other organization and their property is insufficient to pay off all debts, the attorney of other creditors who have obtained enforcement basis may assist the creditor in applying to the people's court to participate in the distribution. The people's court shall accept the application that meets the conditions in a timely manner. If the person being executed is a legal person of an enterprise and the assets are insufficient to pay off all debts or are obviously lacking the ability to pay off, the people's court shall promptly inquire whether the executing applicant and the person being executed agree to transfer the enforcement case to bankruptcy review. If the executing applicant or the person being executed agrees, the attorney shall actively assist the party in providing relevant materials to the enforcement department of the people's court. After entering the bankruptcy procedure, if the debtor has the conditions for reorganization, the attorney shall actively assist the party in applying to the people's court for reorganization. The law firm and lawyer designated by the people's court as the bankruptcy administrator shall earnestly perform their duties, formulate a feasible reorganization plan, and assist the people's court in doing a good job in reorganization.

The people's court shall standardize the review work of transferring enforcement cases to bankruptcy and ensure the orderly connection between the enforcement procedure and the bankruptcy procedure. Actively promote the design of simplified bankruptcy procedures and quickly hear cases of 'no property to break'.

9. Give full play to the role of lawyers in terminating the current enforcement procedure. If the people's court intends to terminate the current enforcement procedure for the case, it shall inform the executing applicant or the attorney of the enforcement situation of the case, the property investigation measures taken, the property situation of the person being executed, the basis for terminating the current enforcement procedure, and the legal consequences. The attorney shall reflect the party's opinions on terminating the current enforcement procedure to the people's court within the scope of the entrusted authority, and at the same time, comprehensively and objectively explain to the party the legal basis and consequences of the people's court terminating the current enforcement procedure.

The people's court shall record the opinions of the executing applicant and the attorney in the file, and it is strictly forbidden to illegally apply the termination of the current enforcement procedure, and shall not force the executing applicant or the attorney to agree to terminate the current enforcement procedure in a disguised form. After the termination of the current enforcement procedure, the people's court shall conduct regular inquiries on the case. If it is found that the person being executed has property available for enforcement, and failure to take enforcement measures immediately may lead to the transfer, concealment, sale, or damage of the property, the people's court may take control measures such as sealing up, detaining, and freezing immediately upon application or ex officio.

10. Give full play to the role of lawyers in enforcement relief. In the process of handling enforcement cases, the people's court shall strictly regulate enforcement in accordance with the law, and it is strictly forbidden to 'coldly and rigidly push' and passively enforce, delay enforcement, and selectively enforce. If the people's court has not enforced the case for more than six months from the date of receiving the application for enforcement, the attorney may guide the party to apply to the people's court at the next higher level for enforcement. The people's court at the next higher level shall accept and review it in a timely manner, and may order the original people's court to enforce it within a certain period of time, or may decide to enforce it by the court or instruct other people's courts to enforce it. If the party or interested party believes that the enforcement act of the people's court violates the provisions of the law, the attorney may guide the party to raise an objection to enforcement or apply for reconsideration in accordance with the law, or apply to the people's procuratorate for procuratorial supervision in accordance with the law.

The people's court shall further promote the system of lawyers' participation in resolving and representing appeals, strictly implement the 'Opinions (for Trial Implementation) on Establishing a System for Lawyers to Participate in Resolving and Representing Legal and Petition-Related Cases' of the Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission and the relevant provisions of the 'Opinions on Gradually Implementing the System of Lawyers Representing Appeals' of the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Justice, further promote the system of lawyers representing enforcement appeals, protect the parties' right to appeal in accordance with the law, and actively resolve enforcement petition cases.

11. Give full play to the role of lawyers in the publicity of the rule of law in enforcement. The people's court, the judicial administration organ, and the lawyers association shall give full play to their respective functions and actively carry out publicity and education on the rule of law in enforcement to the society. It is necessary to widely publicize the consequences of refusing to perform effective legal documents, enhance the parties' initiative and consciousness in performing effective legal documents, promote the formation of a good atmosphere of 'it is glorious to abide by the law and keep promises, and it is shameful to violate the law and break promises', and improve the legal awareness and integrity awareness of the whole society. It is necessary to explain the difference between 'difficulty in enforcement' and 'inability to enforce', help the parties fully understand the litigation risks and the risk of the person being executed losing the ability to perform, guide the people to establish legal awareness and risk prevention awareness, and promote the solution of the difficulty in enforcement from the source.

3. Earnestly strengthen the guarantee for lawyers to participate in enforcement work 　　　　

12. Guarantee the parties' right to entrust lawyers to act as agents in the execution of cases in accordance with the law. The people's court shall inform the parties in the notice of acceptance of the execution case that they have the right to entrust a lawyer to act as an agent in the execution of the case, and list the functions and roles of the lawyer. For those who meet the conditions for legal aid but have not entrusted a lawyer, the people's court shall promptly inform the parties that they have the right to apply for legal aid. Applying to the people's court for enforcement in cases involving people's livelihood such as recovery of alimony, maintenance, child support, and pensions, and meeting the conditions for legal aid, the people's court may transfer the application materials to the legal aid agency in accordance with relevant regulations, and the legal aid agency shall increase the efforts of legal aid.

13. Build a positive interaction between enforcement officers and lawyers. People's courts should fully implement the requirements of judicial openness, smooth normal exchanges and channels for expressing opinions and suggestions, and create a clean, fair, just, open and transparent judicial environment for lawyers to play their role. It is necessary to strictly regulate the behavior of enforcement officers and eliminate problems such as improper interactions and even illegal transactions between enforcement officers and lawyers. In the process of handling enforcement cases, enforcement officers are strictly prohibited from meeting with parties, agents, or petitioners in violation of regulations, or eating, living, or traveling with them; it is strictly forbidden to "eat, take, card, or ask" or ask parties or lawyers to bear expenses that should not be borne by them; it is strictly forbidden to act as litigation brokers, inquire about cases in violation of regulations, or disclose work secrets. Actively build a new type of positive and healthy interactive relationship between enforcement officers and lawyers that respects each other, treats each other equally, supports each other, supervises each other, and engages in legitimate exchanges.

14. Build a convenient and efficient litigation service system. People's courts should use technical means such as APP, instant messaging, and WeChat mini-programs to create "micro-courts" and "smart courts" to provide intelligent litigation services for parties and agent lawyers. It is necessary to deepen the construction and application of enforcement informatization, create an intensive enforcement public platform, and do a good job in connecting the platform with the court's enforcement case management and other systems to provide parties and lawyers with "one-stop" enforcement information disclosure services. It is necessary to enhance the communication and interaction of the enforcement public website, provide parties and lawyers with more convenient channels to contact judges, and mobilize the enthusiasm of lawyers to participate in enforcement, support enforcement, and supervise enforcement.

15. Strengthen the supervision and management of lawyers' practice. In participating in enforcement work, lawyers should adhere to the professional ethics of "loyalty, serving the people, the rule of law, justice, integrity, and dedication", and consciously practice the basic requirements of abiding by the Constitution and laws, being loyal to the truth, strictly abiding by professional discipline, and adhering to prudence in words and deeds. Judicial administrative organs and lawyers associations should strengthen the supervision and management of lawyers' practice in enforcement work, and deal with violations of practice norms and professional ethics in accordance with laws and regulations.

16. Establish and improve the communication and coordination mechanism. People's courts, judicial administrative organs, and lawyers associations should strengthen communication and exchanges, establish and improve a regular coordination and cooperation work mechanism, listen to lawyers' opinions and suggestions on the enforcement work of people's courts regularly or irregularly, study and solve the problems encountered by lawyers in participating in enforcement work, and promptly coordinate and handle matters related to infringement of lawyers' practice rights and lawyers' violations of laws and regulations, and constantly promote the formation of a work pattern of departmental linkage, joint management, division of labor and cooperation, and provide more powerful guarantees for in-depth promotion of lawyers' participation in enforcement work.